[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff-apply-hunk broken
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: diff-apply-hunk broken |
Date: |
01 Apr 2004 08:12:16 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:08:18 -0500
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 06:28:22PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > >> The manpage definitely mentions -L as does `diff --help'.
> >
> > > What version are you referring to? In GNU diffutils 2.8.1-6 (Debian
> > > unstable), diff -L is neither mentioned in the manpage, the info manual,
> > > nor diff --help.
> >
> > ~-0% diff --version
> > diff (GNU diffutils) 2.8.1
>
> FWIW, fencepost has diff 2.7, which supports -L, and --help mentions it.
Actually, -L is supported in Diffutils 2.8.x as well, it's just
undocumented.
The file NEWS in the Diffutils distro tells the story:
* The following diff options are still accepted, but are no longer
documented. They may be withdrawn in future releases.
[...]
-L (use --label instead)
"diff --help" and the node "diff Options" in the Info manual have -L
removed in 2.8.x, but -L is still supported (and mentioned elsewhere
in the Info manual, perhaps inadvertently).
So it sounds like we shouldn't use -L in Emacs, lest it stops working
with future releases of Diffutils. We should use --label instead.
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Miles Bader, 2004/04/01
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/01
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Paul Eggert, 2004/04/03
- Re: diff-apply-hunk broken, Juri Linkov, 2004/04/08