Re: Possible UTF-8 CJK Regressions in Terminal Emulators

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>>  Wait!  If utf-translate-cjk-mode can encode all jis, kcs,
>>  big5, and gb to utf-8, 

> I don't think that's true (or I think it wasn't when I built the
> tables).  Maybe that's not so (now).  Also, the tables are
> customizable by design -- for instance, I anticipated people adding
> characters from CNS.

I've just checked all subst-*.el.  They all contain full
maps, i.e. all defined characters can be encoded into utf-8.
Of course, a character not defined in each standard (e.g.  a
character made by (make-char japanese-jisx0208 37 126))
can't be encoded, but I think the merit of ignoring such a
character is higher than correctly telling that they can't
be encoded into utf-8.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden