[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Insert character pairs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Insert character pairs |
Date: |
Mon, 03 May 2004 10:03:27 -0400 |
I propose to bind `rise-up-list' to currently unused `C-x C-M-u'.
The reason is that it is similar to `backward-up-list' (`C-M-u'),
but with the prefix C-x will move the list backward out of one level
of parentheses instead of moving the point as `backward-up-list' does.
It is true that sometimes we use C-x for a related command. But this
feels not quite right. Partly that's because we have no bindings on
C-M- characters after C-x. (Such combinations are a little hard to type.)
It is an acceptable choice, but I think we should first try to look at
other options. If we can't find anything better then let's use C-x
C-M-u.
- Re: Insert character pairs, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/01
- Re: Insert character pairs, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/02
- Re: Insert character pairs,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Insert character pairs, Johan Bockgård, 2004/05/04
- Re: Insert character pairs, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/04
- Re: Insert character pairs, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: Insert character pairs, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/06
- Re: Insert character pairs, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: Insert character pairs, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/08
Re: Insert character pairs, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/03