[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). |
|
Date: |
Tue, 4 May 2004 18:24:43 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:21:18AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> So in order to avoid version overkill, I think that we would stay at
> 21.x as long as we have "merely" extensive, but not fundamental
> changes.
I agree with this; I think unicode should be 22.0, at least nominally.
-Miles
--
`Life is a boundless sea of bitterness'
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/05
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Robert J. Chassell, 2004/05/04
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David PONCE, 2004/05/14