[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). |
Date: |
05 May 2004 01:49:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > I think we may as well skip making another release from RC. The
> > > question is whether we should call the next release 21.4 or 22.0.
> > >
> > > There has been so much change that maybe the next release should be
> > > 22.0.
> >
> > So in order to avoid version overkill, I think that we would stay at
> > 21.x as long as we have "merely" extensive, but not fundamental
> > changes.
>
> Well, there are SOME fundamental changes from 21.3 to "this" release:
>
> ** Leim is now part of the Emacs distribution.
A difference in packaging is not fundamental.
> ** The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual is now part of the distribution.
A difference in packaging is not fundamental.
> ** The max size of buffers and integers has been doubled.
This is just a minor detail for the user.
> ** GTK support
Probably more relevant. Also image support has been extended to Mac
and Windows, but I consider this more a bugfix than a feature
enhancement: image support never was intended to be X-only. It was
just a tolerated shortcoming in order to get something out.
> Besides, a lot of external lisp packages are now included with emacs
> (tramp, ses, cua, ...)
A difference in packaging... but I repeat myself. It is convenient,
but not fundamental.
> But I don't really case if we call this 21.4, 21.5, or 22.0 -- as
> long as we release something in 2004 !!
Yes.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Richard Stallman, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never).,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/04
- Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David Kastrup, 2004/05/05
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., Robert J. Chassell, 2004/05/04
Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never)., David PONCE, 2004/05/14