[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 2004 18:12:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 04:20:35PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Specifying just NEW-FACE is a special case of specifying a list of
> faces. So I think it is redundant to have a special way to specify
> just one face. It's extra complexity that adds nothing really.
Actually, I've already changed it to work the way you describe, it's just the
C-comment that's out of date (look at the docstring for a more up-to-date
description).
> This specification uses the first face in the list, NEW-FACE, last. I
> think it should use these faces in the order they appear.
Yes, it does (even if that comment makes it sound otherwise).
-Miles
--
I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono album; no rhyme
or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and then it's over. --Ian Wolff
- +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/04
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/05
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/07
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/07
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/10
- Re: +face-remapping-20040505-0.patch, Miles Bader, 2004/05/10