[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compilation-highlight-duration
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: compilation-highlight-duration |
Date: |
Thu, 06 May 2004 20:29:06 -0400 |
> But currently it's not possible to highlight the source buffer
> only in `next-error-no-select'. Perhaps a new argument should be
> added to `next-error' and `compilation-next-error-function' indicating
> whether highlighting is desirable and in what fashion (overlay flashing
> delay duration, fringe arrow, etc.)
I think we should make next-error and next-error-no-select use a common
subroutine. Then next-error-no-select would do this highlighting.
next-error would not do the highlighting.
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, (continued)
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/05
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, David Kastrup, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/08
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/09
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/10
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Stefan Daschek, 2004/05/10
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/28
- next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration), Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error refactoring, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/29