Re: erase-buffer (was: with-output-to-temp-buffer)

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> BTW, it seems the main problem has to do with a conflict between
> erase-buffer when called interactively and erase-buffer when called
> from packages.

> So my question is: why is erase-buffer a command?
> I didn't know it was a command until 5 days ago, it is not bound to any
> key, and I can't think of any circumstance where a user might want to say
> M-x erase-buffer RET.

I often use it in *shell* and *gdb* buffers when they grow
too much.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden