Re: sisheng input method missing

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:

> [1  <text/plain; utf-8 (base64)>]
>>  It seems that each rule has one of these forms:
>>  
>>    VOWEL TONE-NUMBER  -> PINYIN
>>    CONSONANT VOWEL TONE-NUMBER -> PINYIN
>>    
>>  Can't we delete rules of the latter form?

> Basically yes, but I suggest not to do it.  Reason is that not all
> combinations actually do exist.  For example, it is possible in Pīnyīn
> to have `xū' and `shū', but you can't have `shīn' while `xīn' is
> valid.  Providing complete syllables is an aid to beginners to avoid
> incorrect spellings, especially for people who are used to the
> Wade-Giles transcription (which does have `shin' but no `xin').

Ok, then let's use your code as is.  Please send me the
final version.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden