Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch

[Miles Bader]

On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 07:58:31PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >   (2) `rcurry' (reverse-currying) function added
> 
> I'd rather not add such a thing.  Unless you have some concrete
> justification for it.  It's a very unusal operation in my experience.

I was mainly following the example of dylan, which provides both operators.
The added implementation complexity is pretty negligible.

In the distant past when I was using dylan I do recall using rcurry, for
what it's worth.

-Miles
-- 
We have met the enemy, and he is us.  -- Pogo