Re: Function vectors: +funvec-20030516-0-c.patch

[Richard Stallman]

Now that I see what you had in mind for rcurry, it isn't really as
general as what I had in mind.  curry and rcurry together don't
add up to complete flexibility in controlling where in the arglist
the curried args go.  I don't think rcurry is worth adding.

I don't think we should implement the more general feature now--now's
not the time to propose more features.  I just suggested leaving one
slot empty, to be used for such features later.