[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ChangeLog fontifications
|
From: |
Sam Steingold |
|
Subject: |
Re: ChangeLog fontifications |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2004 09:08:59 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) |
> * Miles Bader <address@hidden> [2004-05-19 10:32:18 +0900]:
>
> Anyway (as I keep saying), I've used both extensively, and the
> `official' format is easier to read.
could it be easier to read precisely because Emacs supports it better?
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com>
Good programmers treat Microsoft products as damage and route around it.
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/17
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Karl Eichwalder, 2004/05/18
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Miles Bader, 2004/05/18
Re: ChangeLog fontifications,
Sam Steingold <=
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Miles Bader, 2004/05/19
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/19
Re: ChangeLog fontifications, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/19