[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search |
Date: |
Thu, 20 May 2004 20:31:48 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>> We anyway use two hands to type C-b,
> You do? I usually type C-b with just the left hand, and I guess that
> would be the usual way for touch typists. Or sometimes I do just with
> the right, in case I am busy with the left hand eating or something.
Touch typists don't have to type C-b. And I think they use
Right Shift to type B (i.e. both hands).
At least with my hand (I think it's average as Japanese, but
perhaps smaller than average Western person), pressing both
Ctrl and b with the left hand is a little bit difficult.
>> To me, their importance are almost the same, and I prefer convient
>> keys to keys of meaningful mnemonic. So, I'm using adjoining C-i
>> and C-o for isearch-del-char and isearch-yank-char recently. This
>> is quite convenient at least for me (I have been using C-q C-i to
>> isearch for TAB). What do you think?
> Well, considering that the right control key on today's keyboards is
> rather small if at all existent, those are definitely less convenient
> than C-f and C-b.
I think we don't have to consider that kind of convenience
(i.e. requires two hands or not) to decide a key binding.
>> And, i(n) and o(ut) may give some meaning to these keys.
> But I think it rather common to be searching for TAB characters in
> isearch strings, particularly in regexps.
For me, not that frequent as using isearch-del-char. And,
as I wrote, TAB can be easily searched for by typing C-q
C-i.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Miles Bader, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Karl Fogel, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/05/18
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Kevin Rodgers, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, David Kastrup, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Peter Lee, 2004/05/20
- Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/24
Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/05/18
Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-search, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/18
Re: @#$! new behavior of C-b & C-f in i-searchi, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/05/19