[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display word wrapping
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: display word wrapping |
Date: |
Wed, 26 May 2004 19:51:15 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: 26 May 2004 16:50:24 +0200
>
> But I think it would probably be shortsighted to tackle automatic
> word wrap before the Bidi branch has been merged as well: that one
> has a lot of potential for interference with word wrapping.
Out of curiosity: why do you think so? That is, what aspects of
bidirectional support did you have in mind when you wrote that?
- Re: display word wrapping, (continued)
- Re: display word wrapping, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/29
- Re: display word wrapping, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/29
- Re: display word wrapping, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/30
- Re: display word wrapping, Jason Rumney, 2004/05/31
- Re: display word wrapping, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/05/27
- Re: display word wrapping, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/27
- Re: display word wrapping, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/28
- Re: display word wrapping, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/29
- Re: display word wrapping,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: display word wrapping, David Kastrup, 2004/05/26
- Re: display word wrapping, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/27
Re: display word wrapping, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/05/26
Re: display word wrapping, Henrik Enberg, 2004/05/26
Re: display word wrapping, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/28