[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: insert-directory
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: insert-directory |
Date: |
Wed, 26 May 2004 15:42:17 -0500 (CDT) |
David Kastrup wrote:
Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:
> Below is the latest version of my patch to make `i' in *Locate*
> buffers work.
>
> Before installing it I want to point out the following:
>
> 1. Making `i' work requires making the *Locate* buffer read-only.
> Otherwise, with inserted directories, trying to use `undo' and
> similar commands will result in complete confusion. Is there
> any reason for the *Locate* buffer _not_ to be read-only?
While the locate process is still running, you are adding to the
buffer. Could it be something like that?
Yes, but I believe that my patch binds inhibit-read-only to t around
the one place in `locate' that does all the inserting. Did you try it
out and did you find some place I forgot about?
Sincerely,
Luc.
- insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/23
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/23
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/23
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/24
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/24
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/24
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/24
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/24
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/26
- Re: insert-directory, David Kastrup, 2004/05/26
- Re: insert-directory,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: insert-directory, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/05/27
- Re: insert-directory, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/05/27
Re: insert-directory, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/25