[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error refactoring
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: next-error refactoring |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jun 2004 13:36:49 -0400 |
Yes, and I think maintenance will be easier if next-error
functionality is in its own file.
Why do you think it would matter?
next-error and related functions are just 150 lines.
I don't want to split things into new files which are so small.
- Re: next-error refactoring, (continued)
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/03
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error refactoring, Tak Ota, 2004/06/07
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/08
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/11
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/12
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/06/30
- Re: next-error refactoring, Stefan Monnier, 2004/06/09
- Re: next-error refactoring, Juri Linkov, 2004/06/09
- Re: next-error refactoring, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/10
Re: next-error refactoring,
Richard Stallman <=