Re: next-error refactoring

[Ted Zlatanov]

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004, address@hidden wrote:

    > Yes, and I think maintenance will be easier if next-error
>     functionality is in its own file.
> 
> Why do you think it would matter?

It's easier to maintain a file when it has a single purpose.
simple.el gets modified a lot.

It's not a big deal though.

> next-error and related functions are just 150 lines.
> I don't want to split things into new files which are so small.

Understood, disregard my suggestion then.

Ted