[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el)
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:33:31 -0400 |
To continue on this, what is the proper message to pass to the
sentinel if the connection was closed by remote peer (or broken).
Current message "exited abnormally with code 256" isn't very good,
so perhaps we should change that as well (to what ...?)
"connection broken by remote peer" looks like a good message to me.
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Richard Stallman, 2004/06/01
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/02
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Richard Stallman, 2004/06/02
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Noah Friedman, 2004/06/02
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/03
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/03
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Noah Friedman, 2004/06/03
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/04
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/06
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Richard Stallman, 2004/06/03
- Re: Last change to process.c breaks fetching pop3 mail (gnus/pop3.el), Kim F. Storm, 2004/06/04