[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:55:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 04:47:55PM +0200, Per Abrahamsen wrote:
> > That's quite silly. The `graphical' buttons are much, much, much more
> > recogizable as "buttons" than the old style.
>
> Sure, but they make the interface nearly unusable.
In your original post you complained about lots of things. I _agree_ that
the customize mouse-over reaction is inconsistent, and it ought to just be
mouse-down.
However you are giving the impression that you somehow think the `3d' faces
are bad, even if they were used a bit more consistently with the way other
use them. _That_ simply doesn't make the least bit of sense. Am I wrong
that you feel this way?
[Whatever the case, `nearly unusable' is clearly hyperbole -- I've never
heard _any_ negative comments from a user about the customize buttons.]
-Miles
--
/\ /\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute kitty virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread.
Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/06
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/06/06
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Paul Pogonyshev, 2004/06/06
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/07
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/06/07
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Miles Bader, 2004/06/07
- Re: Customize interface: The use of "boxed" buttons, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/08