address@hidden: Re: Inferior Octave delay]

[Richard Stallman]

------- Start of forwarded message -------
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Inferior Octave delay
From: "Sean O'Rourke" <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 12:15:30 -0700
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden> (Richard Stallman's
 message
        of "Sun, 06 Jun 2004 10:31:29 -0400")
X-MailScanner: PASSED (v1.2.8 84437 i56JFVCi091231 mailbox8.ucsd.edu)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0
        tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,RCVD_IN_ORBS,
              REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
        version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Can you figure out which recent change was responsible for the problem?
>
> Of the three changes in process.c after 5/11, none of them looks
> likely to do this--but it could be one of them.

After some further experiment, I've found that this is actually
gnuplot-mode stepping on something -- this behavior occurs only if it
is loaded before the inferior Octave is started.  Sorry to waste your
time.

/s
------- End of forwarded message -------