Re: display word wrapping

[Kim F. Storm]

Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:

> On 08 Jun 2004 12:43:18 +0200
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Anyway, what does image-type-available-p imply exactly?  Should it
> > perhaps get an &optional display argument like display-images-p does?
> 
> No, I don't think so.
> 
> (image-type-available-p 'jpeg)
> 
> implies that we've linked, either statically or dynamically, the
> libraries needed to process jpeg images, and that we've set up pointers
> to the relevant functions for loading them, etc.
> 
> > For example, postscript images are only supported on frames appearing
> > on X, and so on.
> 
> Whether a frame is able to display a given image is not related to
> image-type-available-p.  But you'll have to ask Kim.

I think it is a separate issue.  

If needed, it should be a separate function display-supports-image-type-p
(following the naming of display-supports-face-attributes-p).

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk