[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in comment-region
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: bug in comment-region |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:06:21 +0200 (CEST) |
> > Thanks. Anyway, my suggestion w.r.t. C-u still holds -- IMHO it
> > is quite inconvenient to control the behaviour of such a versatile
> > function with a global variable.
>
> `comment-region' and `comment-dwim' already have a (much more
> useful) meaning for C-u (in fact, comment-region has several).
I haven't yet used comment-dwim, so I won't say something about this
function. But IMHO it is a strange idea to have `C-u something' do
exactly the opposite of `something'. Until now I've considered the
C-u prefix as a means to get an extended or slightly modified
functionality of a function.
Are there other commands which do the opposite if prefixed with C-u?
And I don't agree with your conclusion that the several meanings of
C-u for `comment-region' are `much more useful'. For me, they are
useful for `uncomment-region' only.
Werner