[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: query-replace-interactive not documented
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: query-replace-interactive not documented |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:07:51 -0400 |
I'd rather say that since we already have special symbols
\1 \2 \3 \#1 \#2 \#3, that the most natural choice would probably be
just \# for the match number. Then we'd have
\\label{fn:\,\# } RET
I am not sure \# makes sense to use inside \,. It would also be
hard to implement.
And it would probably make sense to define \# as a string component
on its own, too, so that we can just write
\\label{fn:\#} RET
if we want to.
That is clean and natural, so I think it is a good feature. However,
people will sometimes want to use the value in more complex
computations, rather than just substituting it.
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, (continued)
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, Juri Linkov, 2004/06/25
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, David Kastrup, 2004/06/26
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, Juri Linkov, 2004/06/26
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/27
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/21
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, David Kastrup, 2004/06/21
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, Richard Stallman, 2004/06/22
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, David Kastrup, 2004/06/22
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, Andreas Schwab, 2004/06/16
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, Juri Linkov, 2004/06/14
- Re: query-replace-interactive not documented, David Kastrup, 2004/06/12