[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ECB
From: |
Jérôme Marant |
Subject: |
Re: ECB |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jul 2004 22:50:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Berndl, Klaus" <address@hidden> writes:
> Berndl, Klaus wrote:
>>>> The biggest difference between ECB and speedbar is that speedbar
>>>> always appears in a seperate frame (it can be forced into another
>>>> frame, but it is not easy), whereas ECB has several layout options,
>>>> AFAIK all of which use windows within the current frame. Many people
>>>> are used to working in other programs within the same frame, so they
>>>> may see this as an improvement over speedbar.
>>
>>> IIRC, ECB uses tree-widget, which has recently been added to the
>>> Emacs trunk. I think this is what you compare with speedbar.
>>
>> No, ECB doesn't use the tree-widget lib it uses its own tree-library!
My apologies. While unpacking ecb, I was confused with tree-buffer.el
which my mind turned into tree-widget.el :-)
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
- Re: ECB, (continued)
- Re: ECB, Jens Lautenbacher, 2004/07/04
- Re: ECB, Eric M. Ludlam, 2004/07/05
- Re: ECB, Stefan, 2004/07/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/12
- Re[2]: ECB, Eric M. Ludlam, 2004/07/12
Re: ECB, Berndl, Klaus, 2004/07/07
RE: ECB, Berndl, Klaus, 2004/07/07
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/08
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/11
RE: ECB, Berndl, Klaus, 2004/07/07
- Re: ECB,
Jérôme Marant <=
RE: ECB, Berndl, Klaus, 2004/07/13
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/14
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/14