[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ECB
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: ECB |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:24:20 -0400 |
But IMO it would make sense to offer both ECB and speedbar so a user can
deside for himself which interface he likes more...
I agree it would be good to offer the user both interfaces.
One way to do that is by having both ECB and Speedbar in Emacs.
But that is not the clean way to do it.
Could you implement speedbar-like behavior as an option in ECB? If
that is easy to do, it would be a big simplification. We would not
have to maintain both (all of) Speedbar and ECB. The parts of
Speedbar that ECB needs, we could integrate into ECB.
ECB has currently a quite powerful layout-engine which allows an user
to create its own window-layout interactively and on the other hand offers a
programming-API to program/create completely new special windows (to display
whatever you want) and synchronize it with the editing-area of ECB.
That sounds quite interesting.
Do you think that this feature should be integrated into Emacs at the
C level?
- Required packages: either CEDET or the standalone libs eieio, semantic and
speedbar (the need of the latter one is discussed above)
Is it accurate to describe CEDET as a packaging of eieio, semantic,
and speedbar? If not, could you clear up my misunderstanding?
Does CEDET contain other things aside from eieio, semantic, and speedbar?
If we want to put eieio and semantic into Emacs, I think we would be
better off without having them packaged in the form of CEDET. Emacs
has its own system of makefiles, and to get clean results, we would
want to handle eieio and semantic like all the rest of the Lisp code
in Emacs.
Conclusion: If the Emacs-team wants to integrate ECB into Emacs i would be
glad
to hear this and it goes withourt saying that i will help and support as
well
as possible.
I think we do want to integrate it. This may need multiple steps.
Can you tell me how many lines of code are in ECB, in eieio, and in semantic?
- Re: ECB, (continued)
- Re: ECB, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/04
- Re: ECB, Jason Rumney, 2004/07/04
- Re: ECB, Jens Lautenbacher, 2004/07/04
Re: ECB, Eric M. Ludlam, 2004/07/05
- Re: ECB, Stefan, 2004/07/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/12
- Re[2]: ECB, Eric M. Ludlam, 2004/07/12
Re: ECB, Berndl, Klaus, 2004/07/07
RE: ECB, Berndl, Klaus, 2004/07/07
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/08
- Re: ECB,
Richard Stallman <=
RE: ECB, Berndl, Klaus, 2004/07/07
RE: ECB, Berndl, Klaus, 2004/07/13
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/14
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2004/07/14