Re: Single process output reading

[Milan Zamazal]

>>>>> "RS" == Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

    RS> I worry about the idea of not running timers, though, 

Why?  There are already many ways how to prevent running timers for a
while in Emacs, like running a piece of Elisp code or calling a process
synchronously.  So what's the problem with the special-case
accept-process-output call?

    RS> and that seems unnecessary for what you need.  I think it would
    RS> be better to implement the feature so that timers do run.

I think that would mean that timers should be generally reentrant, as
well as some kinds of speech output functions.

Regards,

Milan Zamazal

-- 
SomeProgrammersLikeWritingLikeThis.IDontThinkThisFormOfCommunicationIs\
AGoodIdea.IApologizeToAllWhoCantReadMyTextsWrittenInATraditionalStyle.