[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired"
From: |
Masatake YAMATO |
Subject: |
Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired" |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:00:16 +0900 (JST) |
> > > > How do you think using `format' function directly instead of `?' ?
> > > >
> > > > e.g.
> > > >
> > > > uuencode %s %s > %s.uu
> > > >
> > > > Advantage:
> > > > - If the user want to `%' itself in the command line, format function
> > > > can handle it:
> > > >
> > > > echo %%s
> > > >
> > > > - Implementation is not so difficult(for us).
> > >
> > > Not? How do you call the format function? Depends on the number of
> > > %s...
> >
> > Good point.
> > I found next code works.
> >
> > (apply 'format "echo %s" '("a" "a" "a"))
> > => "echo a"
> >
> > So we can pass arguments as much as possible:-P.
>
> As much as possible?
> (apply 'format "echo %s %s %s %s" '#1=("a" . #1#))
>
> Just turns out that apply is not too happy about passing infinitely
> long argument lists on.
Sorry. "as much as possible" is wrong expression.
What I'd like to say is:
(defun count-%s (string)
(let ((count 0)
(pos 0))
(while (string-match "%s" string pos)
(setq pos (match-end 0))
(setq count (1+ count)))
count))
(let ((cmdline "echo %s %s %s %s")
(filenanme "a"))
(apply 'format cmdline (make-list (count-%s cmdline) filenanme)))
=> "echo a a a a"
However, we don't have to take care about "%%s".
Even if %%s is appeared on the `cmdline', we can count it as one.
Giving the `filename' as arguments for `format' more than necessary is
ok.
(let ((cmdline "echo %%s %%s %%s %s")
(filenanme "a"))
(apply 'format cmdline (make-list (count-%s cmdline) filenanme)))
=> "echo %s %s %s a"
Anyway, I think using an environment varaible method I wrote in
another mail is better than this method.
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", (continued)
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Richard Stallman, 2004/08/21
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", David Kastrup, 2004/08/21
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Luc Teirlinck, 2004/08/21
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Luc Teirlinck, 2004/08/21
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Luc Teirlinck, 2004/08/21
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Masatake YAMATO, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", David Kastrup, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Masatake YAMATO, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", David Kastrup, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired",
Masatake YAMATO <=
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Masatake YAMATO, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Luc Teirlinck, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Masatake YAMATO, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Luc Teirlinck, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Masatake YAMATO, 2004/08/25
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Luc Teirlinck, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Masatake YAMATO, 2004/08/22
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Richard Stallman, 2004/08/23
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Luc Teirlinck, 2004/08/25
- Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired", Richard Stallman, 2004/08/26