[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail mbox-format branch
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail mbox-format branch |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:39:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't think it's reasonable to hope for that. Experience shows that
> 21.4 will most probably be followed by a bugfix release 21.5, a month
> or two after 21.4 is out; if that happens, we cannot move 22.1 into a
> pretest before the bugfix release is out.
It will probably take a month or two for the emacs developers
to fix bugs in the unicode branch before starting pretest on 22.1 --
in the meantime, we can run a pretest for 21.5 bug-fix release if
necessary.
>
> Experience also shows that a pretest of a major new release takes
> several months. 21.1 took more than 6 months, IIRC, and it was used
> by more people before the pretest than the Unicode branch is now.
21.1 was developed within a "closed group". 21.4 has been developed
in a wide open forum since day 1, and I think that CVS emacs is used
by MANY users everyday already -- and as such has got more pre-testing
already than 21.1 ever got!
So I'm pretty optimistic re. the length of the 21.4 pretest.
But if we merge the rmail/mbox branch to trunk now, I'm much less
optimistic :-(
> So I don't think 22.1 could be released before the end of next year,
> even with the most favorable assumptions.
Could be...
Personally I don't think that's too bad if we get 21.4 out in 2004.
I think rmail can use BABYL until end 2005 -- why not ??
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, (continued)
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Stefan, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Miles Bader, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Miles Bader, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/10
- Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/14