[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rmail mbox-format branch
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Rmail mbox-format branch |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:36:48 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:38:50 +0900
>
> What's wrong with using a branch for bugfixes in 21.4?
Nothing. What I meant was that we cannot run 2 pretests at the same
time, so if 21.4 is immediately followed by another bugfix release
from the same branch, we cannot start pretesting 22.1 until 21.5 is
out.
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, (continued)
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Stefan, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Paul Michael Reilly, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Stefan, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Miles Bader, 2004/09/09
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Miles Bader, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/10
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11
- Re: Rmail mbox-format branch, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/09/10
- Proof-reading manuals (was Re: Rmail mbox-format branch), Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/11