[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another bug with the macro counter
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Another bug with the macro counter |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:52:01 -0600 (CST) |
David Kastrup wrote:
Mea culpa. Is there any intended effect of (defvar foo) then apart
from silencing the byte compiler?
I believe that it is the express purpose of (defvar foo) to make
clear, to humans and to programs, that the defvar is only there to
silence the compiler and that the real defvar is elsewhere. I believe
that a computer silencing defvar should never specify a value and a
real defvar always should.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, (continued)
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Stefan, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Stefan, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, David Kastrup, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Stefan, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, David Kastrup, 2004/10/31
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Andreas Schwab, 2004/10/31
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Stefan, 2004/10/31
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, David Kastrup, 2004/10/31
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Kim F. Storm, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Kim F. Storm, 2004/10/30
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/10/31
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Kim F. Storm, 2004/10/31
- Re: Another bug with the macro counter, Richard Stallman, 2004/10/31