Re: patch for documentation about version control

[David Kastrup]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>>    "The GNU project recommends RCS, CVS, and GNU Arch which are
>>     free software...",
>
>> some readers could mistakenly infer that the other systems are *not*
>> free software.  And because of that lead-in, the next sentence about a
>> free replacement for SCCS only strengthens the misimpression.
>
> I'd also suggest we don't recommend RCS any more.

Why?  I don't think we have anything else to recommend for versioning
a single file, and without the need of a repository.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum