[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:35:35 -0500 |
For the original case (quitting out of the undo question), that would be
an improvement as you could continue to hit Ctrl-g until all questions
are gone :-). It is a strange case. I have to hit Ctrl-g three times
for the yes-or-no question in the minibuffer to be canceled, but then a
yes-or-no dialog pops up.
I don't follow. If you type C-g, that should quit the command that is
asking the question, so it won't produce any more undo info and it
won't ask any more questions.
If something other than that happens for you, why does it happen?
Is it a bug?
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, (continued)
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/12/25
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/12/25
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/12/26
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/12/27
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/12/28
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/12/26
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Jan D., 2004/12/26
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/12/26
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Jan D., 2004/12/27
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Jan D., 2004/12/27
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Jan D., 2004/12/28
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/12/28
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Jan D., 2004/12/29
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/12/28
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/12/28
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/12/28
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/12/29
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/12/29
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/12/30
- Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/12/30