[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: utf-8.el
|
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
|
Subject: |
Re: utf-8.el |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:09:09 +0900 (JST) |
|
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>> I remember I fixed ccl-mule-utf-8-encode-untrans to preserve
>> invalid utf-8 sequence as far as possible. So perhaps the
>> current version preserves even invalid sequence correctly.
> I've just tested with Markus Kuhn's UTF-8 test file
> (<http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/examples/UTF-8-test.txt>) and current
> Emacs indeed preserves all invalid UTF-8 sequences.
Thank you for the test. That relieves me.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- utf-8.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/18
- Re: utf-8.el, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/18
- Re: utf-8.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/18
- Re: utf-8.el, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/19
- Re: utf-8.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/19
- Re: utf-8.el, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/19
- Re: utf-8.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/19
- Re: utf-8.el, Kenichi Handa, 2005/01/19
Re: utf-8.el, Andreas Schwab, 2005/01/19
- Re: utf-8.el,
Kenichi Handa <=