[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defface doc misses default and some more errors
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: defface doc misses default and some more errors |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 06:53:27 +0200 |
> From: "Lennart Borgman" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:06:18 +0100
>
> Thanks, you are right. I just copied that part. Hm. I just read the
> semantics so to say. What about the semantic error which I was pointing out?
The previous wording was inaccurate, but yours is also inaccurate (or
perhaps simply unclear). I think we need a better wording.
> BTW I think the dividing between Info and the doc strings is a bit
> problematic.
Why? I think the philosophy is that the doc strings are a short
version of the documentation, and the manual is the full version. I
don't see any problem in such subdivision.
Re: defface doc misses default and some more errors, Richard Stallman, 2005/02/10