[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 21.4 not tagged in CVS
|
From: |
Jason Rumney |
|
Subject: |
Re: 21.4 not tagged in CVS |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:48:57 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Nobody expected it. It was a special situation that arose.
I don't think that is a good excuse to ignore CVS and make an ad-hoc
release that is not labelled, nor as far as I can see not even checked
in to CVS.
> The way Richard has described it, I don't think that we can at all
> rule out that a similar situation might happen again.
Which is why it is even more of a concern that this release was so
ad-hoc. There is a danger now that if it happens again, we will lose
the movemail patches.
> The solution would seem to have one branch where critical fixes are
> applied to regardless of whether a release is anticipated.
EMACS_21_1_RC was supposed to be such a branch.