Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line

[Piet van Oostrum]

>>>>> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) (KFS) wrote:

>KFS> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
>>> 
>>>> 2. goto-line is not too frequent command to deserve the sole
>>>> M-g key.  There are many other goto-related commands that could
>>>> share the same mnemonics and have the common M-g prefix key.
>>> 
>>> Forget it.  No precedence, 

>KFS> Huh?  M-g was a prefix key before the change...

Was it? In gnus it is bound to  gnus-summary-rescan-group. At least in the
version a month or so ago.
-- 
Piet van Oostrum <address@hidden>
URL: http://www.cs.uu.nl/~piet [PGP]
Private email: address@hidden