[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?)
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:27:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Lennart Borgman" <address@hidden> writes:
> From: "Luc Teirlinck" <address@hidden>
>> I guess that you have Info-hide-note-references enabled. The reason
>> why it stops on "see" is that the actual text in the buffer is:
>> (*note Character Sets::). and note matches "not".
>
> Thanks. I am feeling better.
The text "*note " has the `display' text property with the string "see "
which is displayed instead of the original text. The function
`isearch-range-invisible' (which is used by Info search) doesn't pay
attention to the `display' property. It processes only the
`invisible' property. It works the same in all Emacs buffers with the
`display' property (in `image-mode', `w3m' mode, etc.) where it finds
the text not visible on the screen.
How to handle this situation is not clear. Should isearch find
the displayed text as a contiguous part of the search space?
The simplest solution is to treat the `display' property like `invisible'
property and to skip the text displayed over the original text.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Lennart Borgman, 2005/03/21
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/21
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Lennart Borgman, 2005/03/21
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?),
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), David Kastrup, 2005/03/21
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/22
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), David Kastrup, 2005/03/22
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Juri Linkov, 2005/03/22
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), David Kastrup, 2005/03/22
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Juri Linkov, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Juri Linkov, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23