[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?)
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:21:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> `*Note' _is_ a part of the text. It occurs in the output produced by
> `makeinfo --plaintext', which, since it is entirely plain text, does
> not have _any_ special markers. Anyway, rather than to argue over
> terminology, the important thing is: the user sees it, search has to
> find it. Note that both `s' and `C-s' in standalone Info correctly
> match `*Note'. If `not' would not match `*Note' in Emacs Info with
> Info-hide-note-references set to t, then this would be very confusing.
====
Did you mean "Info-hide-note-references set to nil"?
> It would make people start to doubt the reliability of search in
> Emacs. (What _other_ stuff does search in Emacs ignore?) It would be
> an outright bug.
Isearch ignores text with `invisible' text properties and hidden
overlays according to `buffer-invisibility-spec'.
Info-search ignores Info files headers, header lines and Tag Table
nodes.
> Sorry for misspelling your name once more in my previous reply.
> I do not know why I keep doing this.
I guess it's because you manually type a citation line every time
you write a response. To insert it automatically you can use message.el
and set `message-citation-line-function' to `message-insert-citation-line'.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), (continued)
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Juri Linkov, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Juri Linkov, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23
- RE: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Drew Adams, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/25
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?),
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/25
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/24
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Juri Linkov, 2005/03/23
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/25
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Richard Stallman, 2005/03/22
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), David Kastrup, 2005/03/22
- Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?), Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/23