Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?)

[Luc Teirlinck]

Kim Storm wrote:

   Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:

   > Actually, the fact that search does not match `see' when
   > Info-hide-note-references is enabled is also confusing, unless one
   > knows the internals of Info-hide-note-references.  However, it would
   > be hard to do anything about that one.  As I already said, to me the
   > _real_ bug is that the Info-hide-note-references implementation abuses
   > the display property.  

   I agree it needs fixing, but not that it is urgent.

I did not claim that it was urgent.  I claimed that it was confusing
and I objected against a similar confusion being regressively
introduced in the case where Info-hide-note-references was nil.

Sincerely,

Luc.