Re: file-name-shadow-mode

[David Kastrup]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     But actually, I think my proposal about a C level interface into
>     substitute-in-file-name would be most efficient, robust and
>     unproblematic in the long run, and possibly useful for other
>     applications as well.
>
> I don't want to do this, because it puts too much complexity in a
> place where it could cause trouble.  I'd rather just stay away from
> it.
>
> To duplicate just the parsing aspect of substitute-in-file-name
> for this one purpose would be better.

My opinion about that differs; but if I find time arguing that point,
I'll do it with a patch.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum