[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs -Q not documented
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: emacs -Q not documented |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Apr 2005 00:47:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
> How about `--default-settings' (which could be abbreviated
> `--default'; perhaps it ought to also accept the plural of that,
> `--defaults', without actually putting it in the option help)?
Since the settings are _not_ the defaults (for example, blink-cursor
is off), that would be extremely misleading.
--plain would be another proposal.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Henrik Enberg, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented,
David Kastrup <=
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/04/05