[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs -Q not documented
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: emacs -Q not documented |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:45:27 +1200 |
> > How about `--default-settings' (which could be abbreviated
> > `--default'; perhaps it ought to also accept the plural of that,
> > `--defaults', without actually putting it in the option help)?
>
> I think that would be very confusing -- -Q actually turns off some of
> the default features such as splash screen, toolbar, menubar, scroll
> bars etc.
>
> --no-nothing :-)
--no-toolbar-menubar-scrollbars-blinking-cursor-splash-screen-init-or-site-file
says it all, but
-Q
which one could guess is "quicker" than -q, is a bit more to the point.
Nick
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Henrik Enberg, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/02
- Re: emacs -Q not documented,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/02
Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/04
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05