Re: emacs -Q not documented

[David Kastrup]

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
>> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Well, -Q has definitely its merits, especially for reporting bugs.
>>> After seeing this discussion I still think that my `--bare' proposal
>>> is not that bad: The -Q options really strips off all features you
>>> would normally like to have for daily work.
>>
>> Yes, --bare-bones or --no-frills seem like good candidates, too.
>
> Since the option is primarily useful for debugging maybe its name
> should contain the word debug.

-debug-setup

This could also set debug-on-error.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum