[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug 130397
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: Bug 130397 |
Date: |
29 Apr 2005 04:45:40 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Geoff Kuenning <address@hidden> writes:
> >From my point of view, both options are bad. The first requires too
> much intelligence on the part of ispell.el. The second is going to be
> hard to enforce.
>
> Opinions are welcomed.
IMHO, intelligence should properly reside in ispell.el since emacs has
all the infrastructure to (dis)ambiguate associations between codings
and other aspects, and since en/decoding occurs on i/o.
if something is hard to enforce that just means you need to have
intelligence in the heuristics that comprise the workarounds in the
error handling (or, omitting this, suffer a buggy ispell experience).
that doesn't seem like much fun to program. better to make clients
sweat the specifications than the non-specifications.
thi
- Re: Bug 130397, Geoff Kuenning, 2005/04/28
- Re: Bug 130397,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=