Re: define-derived-mode

[Luc Teirlinck]

>From my previous message:

   I am not really sure that it is such a great idea to have
   `define-minor-mode' and `define-generic-mode' spew out all these
   automatic defcustoms, but given that they do that, it seems rather
   strange and inconsistent that `define-derived-mode' does not.

If one would make it construct defcustoms, then maybe that should only
happen if the :group keyword is given, so it would not get into the
same default group problems as `define-{minor,generic}-mode'.

Sincerely,

Luc.