|
| From: | Richard Stallman |
| Subject: | Re: flyspell bug |
| Date: | Wed, 11 May 2005 12:29:07 -0400 |
ispell.el shouldn't insist on using "aspell" instead of "ispell"
even when aspell executable happens to be in exec-path.
Of course it should. aspell is a GNU package.
What led you to think the contrary?
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |