|
| From: | Juanma Barranquero |
| Subject: | Re: CL function's docstrings |
| Date: | Wed, 18 May 2005 10:09:54 +0200 |
> How about if you do whatever is best so as to use the best possible names
> in each function?
OK. That's even better. assuming there's no interest in maintaining
absolute argument-name consistency between functions (which doesn't
exist now, to be fair).
--
/L/e/k/t/u
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |