Re: Incompatible change without warning

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 5/20/05, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:

> Please put the definition of unfocus-frame  back in.
> It should not be removed in this release.

OK, no problem.

> You mustn't presume such a thing.

Eh, don't shoot the messenger. I *didn't* remove unfocus-frame, I was
just talking about what I suppose was the frame of mind of the person
who did it :)

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u