[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks. |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2005 10:20:23 -0400 |
Is it possible to use run-hooks in those Emacs versions?
Yes, but it won't always be correct.
Maybe Gnus can do something like:
(or (fboundp 'run-mode-hooks)
(defalias 'run-mode-hooks 'run-hooks))
Definitely not! Gnus should not mess with the way Emacs defines
(or doesn't define) these functions!
Gnus should define a function called gnus-run-mode-hooks, which calls
run-mode-hooks if that is defined, otherwise run-hooks. Then all the
modes in Gnus could use gnus-run-mode-hooks.
- run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/25
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/27
- RE: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Drew Adams, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Miles Bader, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/30
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/31
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/28