[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks. |
Date: |
Sat, 28 May 2005 01:37:56 +0200 |
> Better use:
>
> (defalias 'mymodule-function-in-doubt
> (if (fboundp 'function-in-doubt)
> 'function-in-doubt
> (lambda (..) ...)))
I was only highlighting the fact that defining functions from "future"
Emacsen is Not Good, but yes, your way is better. Every non-contrived
way to get rid of warnings is good in my book :)
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/25
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/27
- RE: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Drew Adams, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Miles Bader, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/30
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/31
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/28